new_3 — Audit Summary

This folder is the next iteration of the five Sico pages. It carries forward the new_2 pages (now fully imgbb-hosted, see images) after a rigorous copy + comment-application audit, plus ambiguities listing every open item that needs your decision.

What was checked

For all 5 pages: 1. Visual QA (visual-qa skill) at 3 viewports (375 / 768 / 1280 px) — overflow, broken images, layout. Fixed a real responsive bug: the Kármentőtálcák catalog grid forced horizontal scroll on mobile/tablet (5 columns at 873 px); now collapses to 3→2 columns and the wide data tables scroll inside their own cards. Desktop renders match the designs. 2. Copy alignment — each page rendered in Chrome, its full text extracted, and diffed against every classified client comment (replace-copy / new-copy text must appear; deletions must be gone). 3. Comment application — all 268 client comments across the 5 pages classified and reconciled against the rendered pages and the human-corrected design exports.

Result

Page	Comments	Copy matches design	Broken imgs	Mobile h-scroll
Home	68	✅	0	none
Dohányzópavilonok	71	✅	0	none
Veszélyesanyag-tároló	63	✅	0	none
Kármentőtálcák	31	✅	0	none (tables swipe in-card)
Raktárkonténerek	35	✅	0	none (tables swipe in-card)

No copy deviations from the corrected designs were found. Every page reproduces the human-edited Figma frame (175:*), which already incorporates the client comments as the human chose to apply them. The audit's "missing" hits were of three kinds, none of which are bugs in the HTML:

• Human consolidations — e.g. the client's ~20 granular Dohányzópavilonok table-row comments were merged by the human into the simpler tables now shown. The HTML matches the design.
• Wording false-negatives — e.g. "Tűzvédelmi Megfelelőségi Tanúsítványnyal" vs the comment's "…Tanúsítvány"; same content, different suffix.
• Client suggestions the human did not adopt — listed in ambiguities for your call.

Open items → ambiguities

The remaining decisions are human-judgment calls (not copy errors), the most important being: 1. Kármentőtálcák testimonials are dohányzópavilon testimonials (likely a copy-paste oversight). 2. Logo-wall heading differs across pages. 3. Footer product-link wording ("Kerékpártárolók & Dohányzópavilonok") not standardised. 4. ~45 bare-dot Figma pins that mark a spot or an uploaded image with no text — need viewing in Figma. 5. Interactive requests (clickable type numbers → photo/floorplan popups) — for the live build, not a static mockup.

These were left unchanged rather than guessed, per the project rule "match the reference — do not invent." Tell me how you want any of them resolved and I'll apply it here in new_3.

Files

• home.html, dohanyzopavilonok.html, veszelyesanyag-tarolo.html, karmentotalcak.html, raktarkontenerek.html — the 5 pages, all images on imgbb, Figma-import ready.
• images — full local-asset → hosted-URL map (208 images).
• ambiguities — per-page open items with Figma pin positions.